54 N.W. 111 (Wis. 1893), Buckstaff v. Viall

Citation: 54 N.W. 111, 84 Wis. 129

Opinion Judge: HARLOW S. ORTON, J.

Party Name: BUCKSTAFF, Respondent, v. VIALL, Appellant

Attorney: For the appellant there was a brief by Felker, Stewart & Felker, and oral argument by F. C. Stewart. For the respondent there was a brief by F. W. Houghton, attorney, and Gabe Bouck, of counsel, and oral argument by Mr. Bouck.

Case Date: January 10, 1893

Court: Wisconsin Supreme Court