537 A.2d 756 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1988), Maggio v. Pruzansky

Citation: 537 A.2d 756, 222 N.J.Super. 567

Opinion Judge: [10] Petrella

Party Name: Carmen J. MAGGIO and Edythe Maggio, his wife, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Stuart PRUZANSKY and Hermyne Pruzansky, his wife, Defendants-Appellants.

Attorney: [7] McOmber & McOmber attorneys for appellants (J. Peter Sokol of counsel and on the brief).

Case Date: February 18, 1988

Court: New Jersey Superior Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

537 A.2d 756 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1988), Maggio v. Pruzansky

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Alabama - 387 So.2d 836 (Ala. 1980), 79-174, Rutland v. Georgia Kraft Co., Inc.
Arkansas - 259 S.W.2d 495 (Ark. 1953), 5-96, Brown Paper Mill Company, Inc. v. Warnix
Arkansas - 296 S.W.2d 199 (Ark. 1956), 5-1105, Cossey v. House
Arizona - 591 P.2d 72 (Ariz.App. Div. 2 1978), 2 CA-CIV 2952, Geronimo Hotel, Inc. v. City of Tucson
Arizona - 616 P.2d 902 (Ariz.App. Div. 1 1980), 1 CA-IC 2269, Pascucci v. Industrial Commission

See all quotations