533 S.E.2d 842 (N.C.App. 2000), COA99-975, Peacock v. Shinn

Citation: 533 S.E.2d 842, 139 N.C.App. 487

Party Name: Edwin B. PEACOCK, Jr., Plaintiff, for the benefit of the taxpayers of the City of Charlotte, v. George SHINN, individually; and George Shinn Sports of Florida, Inc., Charlotte Hornets NBA Limited Partnership, Shinn Enterprises, Incorporated; and, City of Charlotte; and, Auditorium-Coliseum-Convention Center Authority of the City of Charlotte, Defen

Case Date: August 15, 2000

Court: North Carolina Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

533 S.E.2d 842 (N.C.App. 2000), COA99-975, Peacock v. Shinn

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

North Carolina - 126 S.E. 611 (N.C. 1925), 329, Adams v. City of Durham
North Carolina - 132 S.E. 25 (N.C. 1926), 282, Henderson v. City of Wilmington
North Carolina - 141 S.E. 597 (N.C. 1928), 254, Briggs v. City of Raleigh
North Carolina - 2 S.E. 653 (N.C. 1887), Wood v. Commissioners of Oxford
North Carolina - 254 S.E.2d 611 (N.C. 1979), 94, Stanback v. Stanback

See all quotations