53 S.E.2d 726 (Ga.App. 1949), 32371, Hightower v. Scarborough

Citation: 53 S.E.2d 726, 79 Ga.App. 342

Party Name: HIGHTOWER v. SCARBOROUGH.

Attorney: The proof did not support the action as laid and the verdict should have been set aside upon the motion for a new trial., The plaintiff, J. T. Scarborough, uncle of Beeks B. Hightower, brought an action against Bessie Howell Hightower, wife of Beeks B. Hightower, as sole and only heir of Hightowe...

Case Date: Tuesday May 31, 1949

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

53 S.E.2d 726 (Ga.App. 1949), 32371, Hightower v. Scarborough

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 111 S.E. 220 (Ga.App. 1922), 12611, Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. Henderson Lumber Co.
Georgia - 111 S.E. 220 (Ga.App. 1922), 13118, Harrison v. State
Georgia - 147 S.E. 902 (Ga.App. 1929), 19188, Graham v. Jones
Georgia - 63 S.E. 823 (Ga. 1909), Jackson v. Buice
Georgia - 53 S.E.2d 694 (Ga.App. 1949), 32471, Barry Finance Co. v. Lanier