53 N.W. 21 (Wis. 1892), Hinckley v. Pfister

Citation: 53 N.W. 21, 83 Wis. 64

Opinion Judge: SILAS U. PINNEY, J.

Party Name: HINCKLEY and another, Appellants, v. PFISTER and others, Respondents

Attorney: For the appellant Milwaukee Electric Railway Company there was a brief by C. H. Hamilton, attorney, and Turner & Timlin, of counsel; for the appellant Hinckley there was a brief by Turner & Timlin, attorneys; and the cause was argued orally by W. H. Timlin. For the respondents Pfister, Vogel, and...

Case Date: Tuesday September 27, 1892

Court: Wisconsin Supreme Court