527 P.2d 729 (Or. 1974), Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. Department of Revenue

Citation: 527 P.2d 729, 270 Or. 329

Opinion Judge: O'CONNELL, C. J.

Party Name: The SPERRY AND HUTCHINSON COMPANY, Respondent and Cross-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Appellant.

Attorney: Theodore W. deLooze, Chief Tax Counsel, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Lee Johnson, Attorney General, and Walter J. Apley, Assistant Attorney General, Salem. Donald H. Burnett of Bullivant, Wright, Leedy, Johnson, Pendergrass & Hoffman, Portland, argued the cau...

Case Date: Tuesday November 05, 1974

Court: Oregon Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

527 P.2d 729 (Or. 1974), Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. Department of Revenue

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Oregon Caselaw - Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. Department of Revenue
California - Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. Franchise Tax Bd.
US - Reference Stubs - Definitions for ORS 314.605 to 314.675
US - Reference Stubs - Allocation to this state of net rents and royalties
US - Reference Stubs - Allocation of income of financial institution or public utility from business within and without state; rules; alternative apportionment for electing utilities or telecommunications taxpayers

See all quotations