526 P.2d 652 (Colo. 1974), C--493, Denver Urban Renewal Authority v. Cook

Citation: 526 P.2d 652, 186 Colo. 182

Opinion Judge: GROVES, Justice.

Party Name: DENVER URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY, a body corporate and politic of the State of Colorado, Petitioner, v. Jane COOK et al., Respondents. DENVER URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY, a body corporate and politic of the State ofColorado, Petitioner, v. Jane COOK, also known as Jane B. Cook, et al., Respondents.

Attorney: Clark, Martin & Pringle, Warren O. Martin, Denver, for petitioner., Zarlengo & Kirshbaum, Anthony F. Zarlengo, Spencer T. Denison, Denver, for respondents. [186 Colo. 183] Clark, Martin & Pringle, Warren O. Martin, Denver, for petitioner.

Case Date: September 16, 1974

Court: Colorado Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

526 P.2d 652 (Colo. 1974), C--493, Denver Urban Renewal Authority v. Cook

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Colorado - 113 P.2d 999 (Colo. 1941), 14709, City and County of Denver v. Quick
Colorado - 493 P.2d 348 (Colo. 1972), 23790, City and County of Denver v. Hinsey
Colorado - 517 P.2d 845 (Colo. 1974), 26059, Auraria Businessmen Against Confiscation, Inc. v. Denver Urban Renewal Authority
Colorado - 526 P.2d 312 (Colo. 1974), 26302, People v. Davis
Hawaii - 404 P.2d 373 (Hawai'i 1965), 4371, City and County of Honolulu v. Bishop Trust Co.

See all quotations