52 S.E.2d 665 (Ga.App. 1949), 32215, Brandt v. Eckman

Citation: 52 S.E.2d 665, 79 Ga.App. 47

Party Name: BRANDT v. ECKMAN.

Attorney: The court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial for the reason stated in division 7 of the opinion., any other automobile, he was wholly without power or authority so to do, nor has the defendant or the partnership ratified by word or deed the giving of any checks for the purchase of any...

Case Date: Friday March 11, 1949

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Linked as:


Document options

Extract

52 S.E.2d 665 (Ga.App. 1949), 32215, Brandt v. Eckman

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites