52 N.W. 1079 (Minn. 1892), In re Winona Bridge Ry. Co. Samuel W. Hamilton v. Winona Bridge Ry. Co.

Citation: 52 N.W. 1079, 51 Minn. 97

Opinion Judge: Vanderburgh, J.

Party Name: In re Winona Bridge Ry. Co. Samuel W. Hamilton v. Winona Bridge Ry. Co. et al

Attorney: Lloyd W. Bowers, for appellant. William Gale, for respondent Winona Bridge Railway Company. Tawney, Smith & Tawney, for respondents Nortons, Laird and Bolcom.

Judge Panel: Vanderburgh, J. Mitchell, J., took no part.

Case Date: Monday August 29, 1892

Court: Minnesota Supreme Court