51 S.E.2d 370 (S.C. 1949), 16169, State v. Manis

Citation: 51 S.E.2d 370, 214 S.C. 99

Opinion Judge: BAKER, Chief Justice:

Party Name: STATE v. MANIS.

Attorney: Messrs. Thomas W. Whiteside, C. Y. Brown and Sam N. Burts, all of Spartanburg, for appellant, cite: As to the evidence introduced by the State not complying with the rule governing circumstantial evidence: 19 S.C. 238; 74 S.C. 460, 55 S.E. 120; 49 S.C. 285, 26 S.E. 619, 27 S.E. 199; 66 S.C. 394, ...

Case Date: January 12, 1949

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

51 S.E.2d 370 (S.C. 1949), 16169, State v. Manis

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 10 S.E.2d 587 (S.C. 1940), 15136, State v. Edwards
South Carolina - 25 S.E.2d 479 (S.C. 1943), 15534, State v. Powell
South Carolina - 28 S.E.2d 679 (S.C. 1944), 15610, State v. Takis
South Carolina - 37 S.E.2d 525 (S.C. 1946), 15822, State v. Baker
South Carolina - 4 S.E.2d 121 (S.C. 1939), 14923, State v. Kimbrell

See all quotations