51 Cal.2d 766, 20060, Pacific Tel. & Tel. Co. v. City & County of S. F.

Citation: 51 Cal.2d 766, 336 P.2d 514

Opinion Judge: [11] Mccomb

Party Name: Pacific Tel. & Tel. Co. v. City & County of S. F.

Attorney: [7] Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, John A. Sutro, Francis N. Marshall and Noble K. Gregory for Appellant. [8] Dion R. Holm, City Attorney, George E. Baglin and Robert M. Desky, Deputy City Attorneys, for Respondent. [9] Roger Arnebergh, City Attorney (Los Angeles), Bourke Jones, Assistant City Attor...

Case Date: Tuesday March 17, 1959

Court: California Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

51 Cal.2d 766, 20060, Pacific Tel. & Tel. Co. v. City & County of S. F.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 224 U.S. 330 (1912), 215, Pomona v. Sunset Telephone and Telegraph Company
California - 126 Cal. 383, S. F. 2048, Fragley v. Phelan
California - 13 Cal. 343, People ex rel. Blanding v. Burr
California - 160 Cal. 106, L. A. 2445, Western Union Telegraph Co. (A Corporation) v. Hopkins
California - 161 Cal. 265, L. A. 2557, Sunset Telephone v. City of Pasadena (A Municipal Corporation)

See all quotations

51 Cal.2d 766, 20060, Pacific Tel. &amp; Tel. Co. v. City &amp; County of S. F.

51 Cal.2d 766, 20060, Pacific Tel. & Tel. Co. v. City & County of S. F.