51 A. 526 (Conn. 1902), Martin v. Sherwood

Citation: 51 A. 526, 74 Conn. 475

Opinion Judge: HALL, J. (after stating the facts).

Party Name: MARTIN v. SHERWOOD, Receiver, et al.

Attorney: Wellington B. Smith and Frank B. Munn, for appellant. Richard T. Higgins, James Huntington, and Arthur D. Warner, for appellee Martin. Samuel A. Herman, for appellee town of Winchester.

Case Date: Wednesday March 05, 1902

Court: Connecticut Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

51 A. 526 (Conn. 1902), Martin v. Sherwood

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Minnesota - 70 N.W. 860 (Minn. 1897), 10,373, Williams v. Great Northern Railway Company
Wisconsin - 66 N.W. 800 (Wis. 1896), Keller v. The Town of Gilman
Connecticut - 28 A. 102 (Conn. 1893), Rowland v. Philadelphia & B. R. Co.
Connecticut - 51 A. 521 (Conn. 1902), Peck v. Borough of Bristol
Connecticut - 29 Conn. 153 (Conn. 1860), State v. Dart

See all quotations