5 S.E.2d 299 (S.C. 1939), 14953, Floyd v. C. I. T. Corp.

Citation: 5 S.E.2d 299, 191 S.C. 518

Opinion Judge: The opinion of the Court was delivered by MR. JUSTICE BONHAM.

Party Name: FLOYD v. C. I. T. CORPORATION.

Attorney: Messrs. Samuel Want, James S. Verner and Sam Rogol, for appellant, cite: Pleadings: 163 S. C., 13; 161 S. E., 195; 162 S. C., 379; 160 S. E., 881. As to abusive language being actionable: 38 S. C., 532; 36 S. E., 997; 111 S. C., 553; 99 S. E., 350. Splitting cause of action: 1 C. J. S., 1312; 132...

Case Date: Wednesday November 01, 1939

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court