499 P.2d 991 (Ariz.App. Div. 1 1972), 1 CA-CIV 1628, Valley Nat. Bank v. Tang

Citation: 499 P.2d 991, 18 Ariz.App. 40

Opinion Judge: [9] Haire

Party Name: The VALLEY NATIONAL BANK of Arizona, a corporation, Appellant, v. Kim S. TANG et al., Appellees.

Attorney: [6] Rawlins, Ellis, Burrus & Kiewit by Norman D. Hall, Jr., Phoenix, for appellant. [7] Renaud, Cook, Miller & Cordova, P. A., by John H. Seidel, Phoenix, for appellees.

Case Date: July 27, 1972

Court: Arizona Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

499 P.2d 991 (Ariz.App. Div. 1 1972), 1 CA-CIV 1628, Valley Nat. Bank v. Tang

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 422 F.2d 1013 (9th Cir. 1970), 22696, Southwest Forest Industries, Inc. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
Ohio - 234 N.E.2d 524 (Ohio App. 8 Dist. 1968), Central Nat. Bank of Cleveland v. Gallagher
Oregon Caselaw - 349 P.2d 814 (Or. 1960), Irish & Swartz Stores v. First Nat. Bank of Eugene
Ohio - 99 N.E.2d 902 (Ohio 1951), 32375, Kolt v. Cleveland Trust Co.