494 P.2d 24 (Ariz. 1972), 10559, Santa Cruz Irr. Dist. v. City of Tucson

Citation: 494 P.2d 24, 108 Ariz. 152

Opinion Judge: [11] Struckmeyer

Party Name: SANTA CRUZ IRRIGATION DISTRICT, a Municipal Corporation, Petitioner, v. The CITY OF TUCSON, a Municipal Corporation, et al.; The Honorable Joe JACOBSON, Judge of the Superior Court, Pima County, Arizona, Division 11, Real Parties in Interest, Respondents.

Attorney: [6] Wolfe, Greer & Mustacci by David K. Wolfe, Tucson, for petitioner. [7] Herbert E. Williams, City Atty. by Richard H. Day, Asst. City Atty., Tucson, for respondents The City of Tucson and Frank Brooks. [8] Murphy, Vinson & Hazlett by James M. Murphy, Tucson, for respondents Rosens and Brophys....

Case Date: March 01, 1972

Court: Arizona Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

494 P.2d 24 (Ariz. 1972), 10559, Santa Cruz Irr. Dist. v. City of Tucson

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Arizona - 373 P.2d 722 (Ariz. 1962), 6976, City of Mesa v. Salt River Project Agr. Imp. and Power Dist.
Arizona - 483 P.2d 532 (Ariz. 1971), 10011, City of Scottsdale v. McDowell Mountain Irr. and Drainage Dist.
Arizona - 494 P.2d 26 (Ariz. 1972), 10684, Williams v. Superior Court In and For Pima County
Idaho - 445 P.2d 720 (Idaho 1968), 9589, Unity Light & Power Co. v. City of Burley