49 S.E.2d 684 (Ga.App. 1948), 32035, Howard v. State

Citation: 49 S.E.2d 684, 77 Ga.App. 712

Party Name: HOWARD v. STATE.

Attorney: The evidence authorized the verdict and neither of the two special grounds of the amended motion for a new trial were meritorious., The plaintiff in error, Leonard Howard, was tried and convicted in the City Court of Carrollton on an information that he 'did possess for the purpose of sale, malt ...

Case Date: September 25, 1948

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

49 S.E.2d 684 (Ga.App. 1948), 32035, Howard v. State

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 187 S.E. 11 (Ga. 1936), 11091, Ellison v. Doyal
Georgia - 36 S.E.2d 839 (Ga.App. 1946), 31126, Williams v. State
Georgia - 37 S.E.2d 812 (Ga.App. 1946), 31125, Bilbo v. State
Georgia - 49 S.E.2d 677 (Ga.App. 1948), 32125, A. E. Speer, Inc. v. McCorvey