49 S.E.2d 19 (Ga. 1948), 16281, Kay Jewelry Co. v. Kapiloff

Citation: 49 S.E.2d 19, 204 Ga. 209

Opinion Judge: CANDLER, Justice.

Party Name: KAY JEWELRY CO. v. KAPILOFF et al.

Attorney: It is not an essential prerequisite to the granting of equitable relief in an action for infringement of a trade name that the plaintiff allege and show that the alleged infringer is in actual and direct market competition with the plaintiff in the sense that he deals in competitive goods or is e...

Judge Panel: WYATT, J., dissents.

Case Date: Thursday July 15, 1948

Court: Georgia Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

49 S.E.2d 19 (Ga. 1948), 16281, Kay Jewelry Co. v. Kapiloff

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 26 F.2d 972 (2nd Cir. 1928), 305, Yale Elec. Corp. v. Robertson
Federal Cases - 3 F.Supp. 487 (E.D.N.Y. 1933), 13056, Nanuet
Federal Cases - 201 F. 510 (7th Cir. 1912), 1,904, Borden Ice Cream Co. v. Borden's Condensed Milk Co.
Federal Cases - 204 F. 398 (8th Cir. 1913), 3,826, Atlas Mfg. Co. v. Street & Smith
Federal Cases - 133 F.2d 632 (6th Cir. 1943), 9219, Detachable Bit Co. v. Timken Roller Bearing Co.

See all quotations