49 S.E.2d 123 (Ga.App. 1948), 31961, Mayes v. Washington Nat. Ins. Co.

Citation: 49 S.E.2d 123, 77 Ga.App. 638

Party Name: MAYES v. WASHINGTON NAT. INS. CO.

Attorney: a new policy and break the period of continuity, a provision for increase of benefits in case of continuity will be held to dominate over (but not to obviate) the provision that the company is not liable for accident or illness arising during the period of lapse; and the effect of the provision f...

Case Date: June 09, 1948

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

49 S.E.2d 123 (Ga.App. 1948), 31961, Mayes v. Washington Nat. Ins. Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 137 S.E. 848 (Ga.App. 1927), 17643, Winder Nat. Bank v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.
Georgia - 146 S.E. 506 (Ga.App. 1929), Kesler v. Commercial Cas. Ins. Co.
Georgia - 30 S.E. 918 (Ga. 1898), Massachusetts Ben. Life Ass'n v. Robinson
Georgia - 8 S.E.2d 535 (Ga.App. 1940), 27855, Causey v. Gulf Life Ins. Co.
Minnesota - 218 N.W. 104 (Minn. 1928), 26,213, Jennings v. Travelers Equitable Insurance Company