Party Name:
HARMAN YERKES, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. TAYLOR CRUM, Defendant and Appellant
Attorney:
J. E. Robinson and Taylor Crum, for appellant. Stone, Newman & Resser for respondent. Mr. Crum presented the case for the appellant in an exhaustive oral argument, but cited no authorities in his brief. Stone, Newman & Resser for respondent:
Judge Panel:
BARTHOLOMEW, J. WALLIN, J., (concurring.), CORLISS, C. J., concurring in the result. WALLIN; CORLISS WALLIN, J., (concurring.) I agree with my associates in holding that the judgment must be reversed. The answer is meager and vague, but it embodies a material issue of fact, and hence it cannot be...
