49 Cal.3d 186, S007641, McCullough v. Commission On Judicial Performance

Citation: 49 Cal.3d 186, 260 Cal.Rptr. 557, 776 P.2d 259

Opinion Judge: [9] The Court

Party Name: McCullough v. Commission On Judicial Performance

Attorney: [6] David E. Pipal and Rusconi, Foster, Thomas & Pipal for Petitioner. [7] John R. Coughlin, Frank P. Borelli, Steven R. Sanders, Harry J. Tobias, James M. Paxton and John H. O'Brien as Amici Curiae on behalf of Petitioner. [8] John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Aileen Bunney, Michael D. O'Re...

Case Date: July 31, 1989

Court: California Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

49 Cal.3d 186, S007641, McCullough v. Commission On Judicial Performance

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 10 Cal.3d 270, 30058, Geiler v. Commission On Judicial Qualifications
California - 13 Cal.3d 778, 23153, Spruance v. Commission On Judicial Qualifications
California - 29 Cal.3d 615, 24135, Wenger v. Commission On Judicial Performance
California - 33 Cal.3d 359, 31572, Gonzalez v. Commission On Judicial Performance
California - 37 Cal.3d 27, 31751, Gubler v. Commission On Judicial Performance

See all quotations