483 S.E.2d 888 (Ga.App. 1997), A96A1622, Rohm & Haas Co. v. Gainesville Paint & Supply Co.

Citation: 483 S.E.2d 888, 225 Ga.App. 441

Opinion Judge: BLACKBURN, Judge

Party Name: ROHM & HAAS COMPANY v. GAINESVILLE PAINT & SUPPLY COMPANY et al. GAINESVILLE PAINT & SUPPLY COMPANY et al. v. ROHM & HAAS COMPANY.

Attorney: John T. Longino, Ellijay, for appellant., Hicks, Maloof & Campbell, John P. Hutchins, James D. Dantzler, Jr., Atlanta, for appellees. John T. Longino, for appellant. Hicks, Maloof & Campbell, John P. Hutchins, James D. Dantzler, Jr., for appellees.

Judge Panel: BIRDSONG, P.J., and BEASLEY, J., concur.

Case Date: February 28, 1997

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

483 S.E.2d 888 (Ga.App. 1997), A96A1622, Rohm & Haas Co. v. Gainesville Paint & Supply Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 252 S.E.2d 604 (Ga. 1979), 34171, Whiteway Neon-ad, Inc. v. Opportunities Industrialization Center of Atlanta, Inc.
Georgia - 263 S.E.2d 466 (Ga.App. 1979), 58756, Shier v. Price
Georgia - 369 S.E.2d 808 (Ga.App. 1988), 76102, Virgil v. Kapplin
Georgia - 372 S.E.2d 276 (Ga.App. 1988), 76348, State v. Shearson Lehman Bros., Inc.
Georgia - 381 S.E.2d 319 (Ga.App. 1989), A89A0038, Tench v. U.s. Tsubaki, Inc.

See all quotations