482 A.2d 91 (Conn.App. 1984), 2365, Spoto v. Hayward Mfg. Co.

Citation: 482 A.2d 91, 2 Conn.App. 663

Opinion Judge: BORDEN, J.

Party Name: Frank SPOTO, Jr. v. HAYWARD MANUFACTURING CO.

Attorney: David S. Golub, Stamford, with whom, on the brief, were Richard A. Silver, Stanley A. Twardy, Jr., and Susann E. Gill, Stamford, for appellant (plaintiff)., Robert J. Cooney, Bridgeport, for appellee (defendant). David S. Golub, with whom, on the brief, were Richard A. Silver, Stanley A. Twardy,...

Judge Panel: In this opinion the other judges concurred. Before DANNEHY, CPJ, and DUPONT and BORDEN

Case Date: Tuesday September 25, 1984

Court: Connecticut Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

482 A.2d 91 (Conn.App. 1984), 2365, Spoto v. Hayward Mfg. Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Connecticut - 136 A.2d 341 (Conn. 1957), Johnson v. Toscano
Connecticut - 171 A.2d 402 (Conn. 1961), Engelke v. Wheatley
Connecticut - 177 A.2d 801 (Conn. 1962), Donch v. Kardos
Connecticut - 362 A.2d 893 (Conn. 1975), State v. Schaffer
Connecticut - 438 A.2d 865 (Conn. 1981), McKiernan v. Caldor, Inc.

See all quotations