478 S.E.2d 91 (S.C.App. 1996), 2578, Neese v. Michelin Tire Corp.

Citation: 478 S.E.2d 91, 324 S.C. 465

Opinion Judge: HOWELL, Chief Judge:

Party Name: Samuel Terran NEESE, Appellant, v. MICHELIN TIRE CORPORATION and South Carolina Vocational Rehabilitation, Defendants, Of Whom Michelin Tire Corporation is Respondent.

Attorney: H.W. Pat Paschal, Jr., of Miller & Paschal, Greenville, for appellant. N. Heyward Clarkson, III, of Clarkson & Fortson, Greenville, for respondent.

Case Date: October 14, 1996

Court: South Carolina Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

478 S.E.2d 91 (S.C.App. 1996), 2578, Neese v. Michelin Tire Corp.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 109 S.E.2d 441 (S.C. 1959), 17551, Bell v. South Carolina Elec. & Gas Co.
South Carolina - 132 S.E.2d 18 (S.C. 1963), 18093, Bridges v. Wyandotte Worsted Co.
South Carolina - 2 S.E.2d 825 (S.C. 1939), 14876, Marchbanks v. Duke Power Co.
South Carolina - 267 S.E.2d 524 (S.C. 1980), 21236, Parker v. Williams and Madjanik, Inc.
South Carolina - 313 S.E.2d 38 (S.C.App. 1984), 0083, McLeod v. Piggly Wiggly Carolina Co.

See all quotations