475 A.2d 1114 (Conn.App. 1984), 2397, Hanover Hall v. Planning Bd. of City of Stamford

Citation: 475 A.2d 1114, 2 Conn.App. 49

Opinion Judge: TESTO, J.

Party Name: HANOVER HALL et al. v. PLANNING BOARD OF the CITY OF STAMFORD.

Attorney: Gordon R. Paterson and Isadore M. Mackler, Stamford, with whom, on the brief, were Elinor J. Paterson and Saul Kwartin, Stamford, for appellants (plaintiffs)., Edward J. Frattaroli, Cos Cob, with whom, on the brief, was William J. Hennessey, Jr., Stamford, for appellee (defendant). Gordon R. Pat...

Judge Panel: In this opinion the other judges concurred. Before TESTO, HULL and BORDEN

Case Date: Tuesday May 29, 1984

Court: Connecticut Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

475 A.2d 1114 (Conn.App. 1984), 2397, Hanover Hall v. Planning Bd. of City of Stamford

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Connecticut - 137 A.2d 542 (Conn. 1957), Slagle v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of City of Meriden
Connecticut - 220 A.2d 277 (Conn. 1966), Aurora v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Town of East Haven
Connecticut - 266 A.2d 396 (Conn. 1969), Sheridan v. Planning Bd. of City of Stamford
Connecticut - 286 A.2d 320 (Conn. 1971), First Church of Christ, Scientist v. Friendly Ice Cream
Connecticut - 301 A.2d 244 (Conn. 1972), Jarvis Acres, Inc. v. Zoning Commission of Town of East Hartford

See all quotations