47 So. 937 (Fla. 1908), Brash v. Ehrman

Citation: 47 So. 937, 56 Fla. 153

Opinion Judge: PARKHILL, J. (after stating the facts as above).

Party Name: BRASH v. EHRMAN et al.

Attorney: [56 Fla. 157]Sparkman & Carter, for plaintiff in error. Wall & McKay, for defendants in error. '(1) Because the said plea is frivolous, and constitutes no defense whatsoever to the cause of action set up in the declaration. '(4) Because, under the admissions and allegations of the defendant in sa...

Case Date: Tuesday December 15, 1908

Court: Florida Supreme Court