47 S.E.2d 830 (Ga.App. 1948), 31904, Summerville v. State

Citation: 47 S.E.2d 830, 77 Ga.App. 106

Party Name: SUMMERVILLE v. STATE.

Attorney: (a) The failure of the evidence in this case to show the distillation of any quantity of whisky does not, therefore, leave the conviction of the accused without any evidence to show that he was guilty of making such beer, and the indictment is broad enough in its terms to include the crime of mak...

Case Date: May 13, 1948

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

47 S.E.2d 830 (Ga.App. 1948), 31904, Summerville v. State

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 103 S.E. 852 (Ga.App. 1920), 11296, Belcher v. State
Georgia - 122 S.E. 649 (Ga.App. 1924), 15312, Lindsay v. State
Georgia - 158 S.E. 365 (Ga.App. 1931), 20800, Horton v. Tway
Georgia - 99 S.E. 711 (Ga.App. 1919), 10468, Williams v. State
Georgia - 47 S.E.2d 829 (Ga.App. 1948), 31946, Roberts v. State