47 S.E.2d 58 (Ga. 1948), 16092, Loomis v. State

Citation: 47 S.E.2d 58, 203 Ga. 394

Opinion Judge: BELL, Justice.

Party Name: LOOMIS v. STATE.

Attorney: rule would be different if the litigant could not know or could not reasonably anticipate that the substance of the statute would be given in charge to the jury., (a) The present case does not present any constitutional or other question such as would fix jurisdiction in this court, and it is the...

Case Date: Friday March 19, 1948

Court: Georgia Supreme Court

Linked as:


Document options

Extract

47 S.E.2d 58 (Ga. 1948), 16092, Loomis v. State

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites