468 A.2d 1238 (Conn.App. 1983), 2285, Boland v. Catalano

Citation: 468 A.2d 1238, 1 Conn.App. 90

Opinion Judge: PER CURIAM.

Party Name: Ruth BOLAND v. Ronald M. CATALANO.

Attorney: Harry Cohen, New Milford, for appellant (plaintiff)., Richard Nahley, Danbury, with whom was James E. Ryan, Danbury, for appellee (defendant). Harry Cohen, for the appellant (plaintiff). Richard Nahley, with whom was James E. Ryan, for the appellee (defendant).

Judge Panel: Before DANNEHY, CPJ, and DUPONT and BORDEN

Case Date: December 20, 1983

Court: Connecticut Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

468 A.2d 1238 (Conn.App. 1983), 2285, Boland v. Catalano

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 18 Cal.3d 660, 30520, Marvin v. Marvin
Illinois - 394 N.E.2d 1204 (Ill. 1979), 51264, Hewitt v. Hewitt
Connecticut - 30 A. 772 (Conn. 1894), Pitkin v. New York & N.E. R. Co.
Connecticut - 35 A. 266 (Conn. 1896), Greenthal v. Lincoln
Connecticut - 468 A.2d 1240 (Conn.App. 1983), 2362, Mullai v. Mullai