464 N.E.2d 564 (Ohio 1984), 83-1476, State ex rel. Kokocinski v. Industrial Com'n of Ohio

Citation: 464 N.E.2d 564, 11 Ohio St.3d 186

Opinion Judge: Per Curiam.

Party Name: The STATE, ex rel. KOKOCINSKI, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO et al.

Attorney: Wagoner, Steinberg, Chinnis & Dorf and Michael D. Dorf, Holland, for relator., Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., Atty. Gen., Lee M. Smith and Richard C. Slavin, Asst. Attys. Gen., for respondent Industrial Com'n., Spengler, Nathanson, Heyman, McCarthy & Durfee, James P. Triona and James M. Sciarini, To...

Judge Panel: FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, C.J., and SWEENEY, LOCHER, CLIFFORD F. BROWN and JAMES P. CELEBREZZE, JJ., concur. WILLIAM B. BROWN, J., dissents.

Case Date: June 20, 1984

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

464 N.E.2d 564 (Ohio 1984), 83-1476, State ex rel. Kokocinski v. Industrial Com'n of Ohio

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Ohio - 125 N.E.2d 1 (Ohio 1955), 33990, Fox v. Industrial Commission of Ohio
Ohio - 278 N.E.2d 24 (Ohio 1972), 71-476, State ex rel. Haines v. Industrial Commission
Ohio - 391 N.E.2d 1015 (Ohio 1979), 78-1424, State ex rel. Kramer v. Industrial Commission
Ohio - 397 N.E.2d 403 (Ohio 1979), 78-1517, State ex rel. Humble v. Mark Concepts, Inc.
Ohio - 429 N.E.2d 433 (Ohio 1981), 81-472, State ex rel. Teece v. Industrial Commission of Ohio

See all quotations