46 S.E.2d 173 (S.C. 1948), 16040, Brewer v. Charleston Shipbuilding & Drydock Co.

Citation: 46 S.E.2d 173, 212 S.C. 43

Opinion Judge: OXNER, Justice:

Party Name: BREWER v. CHARLESTON SHIPBUILDING & DRYDOCK CO. et al.

Attorney: Messrs. Williams & Busbee, of Aiken, for Appellant, cite: As to testimony of physician not being determinative when there is also testimony of contradictory physical facts: 208 S.C. 35, 36 S.E.2d 858. Messrs. Buist & Buist, of Charleston, for Respondents, cite: As to insufficiency of appellant's ...

Case Date: Thursday February 05, 1948

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

46 S.E.2d 173 (S.C. 1948), 16040, Brewer v. Charleston Shipbuilding & Drydock Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Pennsylvania - 124 A. 168 (Pa. 1924), 26, Mauchline v. State Ins. Fund
South Carolina - 14 S.E.2d 367 (S.C. 1941), 15246, Baker v. Graniteville Co.
South Carolina - 3 S.E.2d 489 (S.C. 1939), 14898, Jeffers v. Manetta Mills
South Carolina - 32 S.E.2d 1 (S.C. 1944), 15686, Branch v. Pacific Mills
South Carolina - 35 S.E.2d 838 (S.C. 1945), 15778, Mack v. Branch 12, Post Exchange, Fort Jackson

See all quotations

46 S.E.2d 173 (S.C. 1948), 16040, Brewer v. Charleston Shipbuilding &amp; Drydock Co.

46 S.E.2d 173 (S.C. 1948), 16040, Brewer v. Charleston Shipbuilding & Drydock Co.