454 S.E.2d 339 (S.C.App. 1995), 2291, Pinckney v. Atkins

Citation: 454 S.E.2d 339, 317 S.C. 340

Opinion Judge: Per Curiam:

Party Name: Franklin PINCKNEY, Respondent, v. Ruth P. ATKINS, Appellant.

Attorney: Dale E. Slambrook, of Steinberg, Spitz, Goldberg, Pearlman, Holmes, White & O'Neill, Goose Creek, for appellant. John B. Williams, Moncks Corner, for respondent.

Case Date: January 23, 1995

Court: South Carolina Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

454 S.E.2d 339 (S.C.App. 1995), 2291, Pinckney v. Atkins

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 115 S.E.2d 659 (S.C. 1960), 17691, Bennett v. Floyd
South Carolina - 131 S.E.2d 248 (S.C. 1963), 18075, Few v. Few
South Carolina - 380 S.E.2d 862 (S.C.App. 1989), 1340, Pruitt v. Pruitt
South Carolina - 382 S.E.2d 897 (S.C. 1989), 23053, Anderson v. Anderson
South Carolina - 387 S.E.2d 694 (S.C.App. 1989), 1430, River Road Co. v. Energy Master Products, Inc.

See all quotations