453 S.E.2d 253 (S.C.App. 1994), 2267, Soil Remediation Co. v. Nu-Way Environmental, Inc.

Citation: 453 S.E.2d 253, 317 S.C. 274

Opinion Judge: GOOLSBY, Judge:

Party Name: SOIL REMEDIATION COMPANY and Yadkin Brick Company, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. NU-WAY ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, Respondent, v. CAROLINA EASTMAN DIVISION, a Division of Eastman Kodak Company, Third-Party Defendant, Yeargin, Inc., Third-Party Defendant, Appellant.

Attorney: Stephen E. Hudson and R. Scott Tewes, both of Kilpatrick & Cody, of Atlanta, GA, for appellant. W. Thomas Lavender, Jr. and Russell T. Burke, both of Nexsen, Pruet, Jacobs & Pollard, Columbia, for respondent.

Case Date: December 12, 1994

Court: South Carolina Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

453 S.E.2d 253 (S.C.App. 1994), 2267, Soil Remediation Co. v. Nu-Way Environmental, Inc.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 219 S.E.2d 827 (S.C. 1975), 20108, Green v. Thornton
South Carolina - 220 S.E.2d 221 (S.C. 1975), 20116, McMillen Feed Mills, Inc., of South Carolina v. Mayer
South Carolina - 220 S.E.2d 231 (S.C. 1975), 20120, Hughes v. Edwards
South Carolina - 321 S.E.2d 258 (S.C. 1984), 22159, Spartanburg Sanitary Sewer Dist. v. City of Spartanburg
South Carolina - 326 S.E.2d 165 (S.C.App. 1985), 0380, Alton Newton Evangelistic Ass'n, Inc. v. South Carolina Employment Sec. Com'n

See all quotations