45 Cal.App.3d 432, 44332, In re Marriage of Imperato

Citation: 45 Cal.App.3d 432, 119 Cal.Rptr. 590

Opinion Judge: [10] Hastings

Party Name: In re Marriage of Imperato

Attorney: [7] Moore & Myers and Kenneth L. Harvey for Appellant. [8] DeMarco, Barger, Beral & Pierno, Burkley & Moore, Robert L. Weiner and Kent R. Keller, for Respondent.

Case Date: Wednesday February 19, 1975

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

45 Cal.App.3d 432, 44332, In re Marriage of Imperato

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 156 Cal. 1, S. F. 4,882, Pereira v. Pereira
California - 57 Cal.2d 733, 7185, In re Neilson's Estate
California - 6 Cal.3d 12, 22786, Beam v. Bank of America
California - 112 Cal.App. 138, Civ. 7302, Makeig v. United Sec. Bank & Trust Co.
California - 53 Cal.App. 17, Civ. 3603, Van Camp v. Van Camp

See all quotations