45 Cal.2d 784, 23085, Oosten v. Hay Haulers Etc. Union

Citation: 45 Cal.2d 784, 291 P.2d 17

Opinion Judge: [11] Carter

Party Name: Oosten v. Hay Haulers Etc. Union

Attorney: [7] Vaughan, Brandlin & Wehrle, Vaughan & Brandlin, J. R. Vaughan and Richard I. Roemer for Appellant. [8] Russell E. Parsons and John Van Aalst for Respondent. [9] Bronson, Bronson & McKinnon, A. F. Mather, Charles A. Rummel, Joseph Wahrhaftig and John H. Painter as Amici Curiae on behalf of Res...

Case Date: December 23, 1955

Court: California Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

45 Cal.2d 784, 23085, Oosten v. Hay Haulers Etc. Union

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 158 F.2d 490 (9th Cir. 1946), 11081, Kiyoichi Fujikawa v. Sunrise Soda Water Works Co.
California - 172 Cal. 289, L. A. 3633, Mineral Park Land Company v. Howard
California - 25 Cal.2d 45, 18690, Mitchell v. Ceazan Tires, Ltd.
California - 30 Cal.2d 144, 19381, Autry v. Republic Productions, Inc.
California - 124 Cal.App.2d 71, 19810, Hensler v. City of Los Angeles

See all quotations