45 Cal.2d 244, 19308, Martinez v. Southern Pacific Co.

Citation: 45 Cal.2d 244, 288 P.2d 868

Opinion Judge: [11] Spence

Party Name: Martinez v. Southern Pacific Co.

Attorney: [7] John Said and Crossland & Crossland for Appellants. [8] Higgs, Fletcher & Mack, DeWitt A. Higgs, Betts, Ely & Loomis, Spray, Gould & Bowers, Parker, Stanbury, Reese & McGee, Early, Maslach, Foran & Williams and Teague & Dixon as Amici Curiae on behalf of Appellants. [9] John D. Chinello and L...

Case Date: October 14, 1955

Court: California Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

45 Cal.2d 244, 19308, Martinez v. Southern Pacific Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 212 Cal. 678, S. F. 13434, Trudell v. Leatherby
California - 19 Cal.2d 428, 17813, Whitechat v. Guyette
California - 23 Cal.2d 221, 18641, Estate of Bristol
California - 27 Cal.2d 765, 19535, Huebotter v. Follett
California - 36 Cal.2d 634, 6000, Richter v. Walker

See all quotations