446 S.W.2d 515 (Tenn. 1969), Steagall v. Dot Mfg. Corp.

Citation: 446 S.W.2d 515, 223 Tenn. 428

Opinion Judge: [4] HUMPHREYS, Justice.

Party Name: Thomas Lee STEAGALL, Respondent and Plaintiff, v. DOT MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, Petitioner and Defendant.

Attorney: [1] [223 Tenn. 429] C. H. Rutherford, Jr., and James P. Guenther, Nashville, for respondent-plaintiff. [2] Branstetter, Moody & Kilgore, Nashville, for petitioner-defendant, W. A. Moody, Nashville, of counsel.

Case Date: October 24, 1969

Court: Tennessee Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

446 S.W.2d 515 (Tenn. 1969), Steagall v. Dot Mfg. Corp.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Oregon Caselaw - 168 P. 625 (Or. 1917), Myrtle Point Transp. Co. v. Port of Coquille River
New York - 47 N.Y. 282, Caldwell v. New Jersey Steamboat Co.
Tennessee - 218 S.W. 817 (Tenn. 1920), Moody v. Gulf Refining Co.
Tennessee - 111 S.W.2d 386 (Tenn.Ct.App. 1937), English v. George Cole Motor Co.
Tennessee - 125 S.W.2d 193 (Tenn.Ct.App. 1938), American Nat. Bank v. Wolfe

See all quotations