444 P.2d 996 (N.M.App. 1968), 144, Lopez v. Schultz & Lindsay Const. Co.

Citation: 444 P.2d 996, 79 N.M. 485, 1968 -NMCA- 064

Opinion Judge: [10] Oman

Party Name: Joe E. LOPEZ and Delma Lopez, his wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SCHULTZ & LINDSAY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, employer, Employer's Life Insurance Company, Insurer, Defendants-Appellees.

Attorney: [7] James A. Scarborough, Espanola, for appellant. [8] Richard S. Morris, Sumner Buell, Montgomery, Federici, Andrews, Hannas & Morris, Santa Fe, for appellee.

Judge Panel: SPIESS, C.J., concurs. ARMIJO, J., dissenting. ARMIJO, Judge (dissenting).

Case Date: August 09, 1968

Court: Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

444 P.2d 996 (N.M.App. 1968), 144, Lopez v. Schultz & Lindsay Const. Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 255 Cal.App.2d 30, 31872, Wilhelm v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Bd.
California - 255 Cal.App.2d 40, 24194, Reimel v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Bd.
Kansas - 429 P.2d 101 (Kan. 1967), 44933, Ippolito v. Katz Drug Co.
New Mexico - 141 P.2d 321 (N.M. 1943), 4736, La Rue v. Johnson
New Mexico - 3 P.2d 1068 (N.M. 1931), 3613, Dimas v. Albuquerque & Cerrillos Coal Co.

See all quotations