441 N.W.2d 565 (Minn.App. 1989), CX-89-82, Karnes v. Milo Beauty and Barber Supply Co., Inc.

Citation: 441 N.W.2d 565

Opinion Judge: The opinion of the court was delivered by: Forsberg

Party Name: Nan Mary KARNES, Respondent, v. MILO BEAUTY AND BARBER SUPPLY COMPANY, INC., d/b/a The Milo Corporation, et al., Appellants.

Attorney: James P. Wilkins, John E. Holcomb, Millisor & Nobil, Akron, Oh, Susan L. Segal, Lunn B. Noland, Gray, Plant, Mooty, Mooty & Bennett, Minneapolis, Minnesota, Attorneys for appellant.

Case Date: June 13, 1989

Court: Minnesota Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

441 N.W.2d 565 (Minn.App. 1989), CX-89-82, Karnes v. Milo Beauty and Barber Supply Co., Inc.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Minnesota - 203 N.W. 974 (Minn. 1925), 24,029, Friedell v. Blakely Printing Company
Minnesota - 235 N.W.2d 371 (Minn. 1975), 44923, McBride v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Minnesota - 244 N.W.2d 105 (Minn. 1976), 45278, Milbank Mut. Ins. Co. v. Proksch
Minnesota - 297 N.W.2d 252 (Minn. 1980), 49951, Stuempges v. Parke, Davis & Co.
Minnesota - 347 N.W.2d 272 (Minn. 1984), C4-82-1396, Hauenstein v. Loctite Corp.

See all quotations