44 S.W.2d 696 (Tex.Crim.App. 1931), 14215, Wicklund v. State

Citation: 44 S.W.2d 696, 119 Tex.Crim. 96

Opinion Judge: LATTIMORE, J. Analyzing the proposition further, we observe that neither Mr. Steele nor Mr. Colley occupied said building as a residence, nor is either of them shown to have been around said building all the time. Both appear to be men of general ownership, in a legal sense, of substations of the railway company; Mr. Steele, as resident electrical

Party Name: WICKLUND ET AL. v. STATE.

Attorney: [119 Tex.Crim. 97] Sam W. Davis and Berry & Berry, all of Houston, for appellants. O'Brien Stevens, Crim. Dist. Atty., and E. T. Branch, both of Houston, and Lloyd W. Davidson, State's Atty., of Austin, for the State.

Case Date: Wednesday November 18, 1931

Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals