44 S.E.2d 550 (Ga. 1947), 15968, Estes v. Jones

Citation: 44 S.E.2d 550, 202 Ga. 749

Opinion Judge: HEAD, Justice.

Party Name: ESTES et al. v. JONES.

Attorney: The respondent filed an answer admitting the facts set out in the petition, but alleging that the act set out in the complaint would not be controlling, because such act is inconsistent with the constitution of the State in the following particulars: (a) 'Said act is inconsistent with article VII...

Case Date: Thursday October 16, 1947

Court: Georgia Supreme Court

Linked as:


Document options

Extract

44 S.E.2d 550 (Ga. 1947), 15968, Estes v. Jones

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites