44 S.E.2d 492 (Ga.App. 1947), 31749, Haney v. State

Citation: 44 S.E.2d 492, 75 Ga.App. 736

Party Name: HANEY v. STATE.

Attorney: When whisky is found on the premises of the defendant, which are in his exclusive control and possession as husband and head of the family, the inference arises that the possession is that of the defendant and is with his knowledge and consent, but the inference is a rebuttable one. Gray v. State...

Case Date: Wednesday October 01, 1947

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

44 S.E.2d 492 (Ga.App. 1947), 31749, Haney v. State

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 88 S.E. 715 (Ga.App. 1916), 7199, Stewart v. State
Georgia - 88 S.E. 715 (Ga.App. 1916), 7097, Autrey v. State
Georgia - 13 S.E.2d 92 (Ga.App. 1941), 28711, Thomas v. State
Georgia - 16 S.E.2d 916 (Ga.App. 1941), 29186, Gray v. State
Georgia - 44 S.E.2d 562 (Ga.App. 1947), 31760, Payne v. State

See all quotations