44 S.E.2d 136 (Ga.App. 1947), 31567, Creaden v. Krogh

Citation: 44 S.E.2d 136, 75 Ga.App. 675

Party Name: CREADEN v. KROGH. KROGH v. CREADEN.

Attorney: of the judgment rendered in such other State. Roberts v. Roberts, 174 Ga. 645, 163 S.E. 735; McLendon v. McLendon, 66 Ga.App. 156, 17 S.E.2d 252., 2. To maintain such a suit, it is not necessary to show an authenticated copy of the record of the entire divorce and alimony proceedings, but a prima...

Case Date: September 13, 1947

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

44 S.E.2d 136 (Ga.App. 1947), 31567, Creaden v. Krogh

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 57 Ga. 166 (Ga. 1876), Hawkins v. The County of Sumter
Georgia - 163 S.E. 735 (Ga. 1932), 8752, Roberts v. Roberts
Georgia - 37 S.E. 743 (Ga. 1900), Little Rock Cooperage Co. v. Hodge
Georgia - 59 S.E. 331 (Ga.App. 1907), 602, Hicks v. Hamilton
Georgia - 17 S.E.2d 252 (Ga.App. 1941), 29094, McLendon v. McLendon

See all quotations