44 N.W. 59 (Minn. 1890), City of St. Paul v. Nickl

Citation: 44 N.W. 59, 42 Minn. 262

Opinion Judge: Vanderburgh, J.

Party Name: City of St. Paul v. Michael Nickl and another

Attorney: Otto K. Sauer and Chapin & Sauer, for relators. H. J. Horn and Davis, Kellogg & Severance, for other land-owners interested. Oscar E. Holman, for respondent.

Case Date: Friday January 03, 1890

Court: Minnesota Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

44 N.W. 59 (Minn. 1890), City of St. Paul v. Nickl

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 19 Cal. 579, People ex rel. Heyneman v. Blake
Minnesota - 16 Minn. 329 (Minn. 1871), Clague v. Hodgson
Minnesota - 22 Minn. 494 (Minn. 1876), Rogers v. City of St. Paul
Minnesota - 23 Minn. 232 (Minn. 1876), Carpenter v. City of St. Paul
Minnesota - 25 Minn. 123 (Minn. 1878), Bruggerman v. True

See all quotations