44 N.W. 1107 (Wis. 1890), Holtz v. State

Citation: 44 N.W. 1107, 76 Wis. 99

Opinion Judge: HARLOW S. ORTON, J.

Party Name: HOLTZ, Plaintiff in error, v. THE STATE, Defendant in error

Attorney: For the plaintiff in error there was a brief by Cate, Jones & Sanborn, and oral argument by G. W. Cate. They contended, inter alia, that it was proper to impeach the witness Augusta by showing that she was a prostitute. For the defendant in error there was a brief by the Attorney General and L. K...

Case Date: Tuesday February 25, 1890

Court: Wisconsin Supreme Court