44 Cal.App.4th 263, B091628, Suzuki v. City of Los Angeles

Citation: 44 Cal.App.4th 263, 51 Cal.Rptr.2d 880

Opinion Judge: [10] The opinion of the court was delivered by: Johnson

Party Name: Suzuki v. City of Los Angeles

Attorney: [7] James K. Hahn, City Attorney, Claudia McGee Henry and Gwendolyn Ryder Poindexter, Assistant City Attorneys, for Defendant and Appellant. [8] Stephen L. Jones for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

Case Date: April 08, 1996

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

44 Cal.App.4th 263, B091628, Suzuki v. City of Los Angeles

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 195 Cal. 477, L. A. 8012, Miller v. Board of Public Works of City of Los Angeles
California - 11 Cal.2d 168, 15209, Hassell v. San Francisco
California - 40 Cal.2d 642, 21915, Edmonds v. County of Los Angeles
California - 43 Cal.2d 121, 22991, Livingston Rock Etc. Co. v. County of L. A.
California - 57 Cal.2d 74, 26517, Magit v. Board of Medical Examiners

See all quotations