44 Cal.2d 52, 18982, City & County of San Francisco v. Ross

Citation: 44 Cal.2d 52, 279 P.2d 529

Opinion Judge: [10] Shenk

Party Name: City & County of San Francisco v. Ross

Attorney: [7] Dion R. Holm, City Attorney, and John Elmer Barricklo, Deputy City Attorney for Petitioner. [8] Jesse H. Steinhart, B. J. Feigenbaum, John H. Steinhart and Joseph J. Carter, for Respondent.

Case Date: Thursday February 03, 1955

Court: California Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

44 Cal.2d 52, 18982, City & County of San Francisco v. Ross

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 348 U.S. 26 (1954), 22, Berman v. Parker
California - 206 Cal. 315, S. F. 13079, City of Oakland v. Williams
California - 39 Cal.2d 813, 21968, Serve Yourself Gas Etc. Assn. v. Brock
California - 136 Cal.App. 180, Civ. 8966, Mackay v. City of Los Angeles
California - 48 Cal.App. 720, Civ. 1683, City of Los Angeles v. Koyer

See all quotations

44 Cal.2d 52, 18982, City &amp; County of San Francisco v. Ross

44 Cal.2d 52, 18982, City & County of San Francisco v. Ross