44 A. 228 (Conn. 1899), Dickerman v. New York, N.H. & H. R. Co.

Citation: 44 A. 228, 72 Conn. 271

Opinion Judge: ANDREWS, C.J. (after stating the facts).

Party Name: DICKERMAN v. NEW YORK, N.H. & H. R. CO. et al.

Attorney: Henry Stoddard and John W. Bristol, for plaintiff. George D. Watrous, for defendant New York, N.H. & H. R. Co. William H. Ely, for defendant city of New Haven.

Case Date: Thursday October 05, 1899

Court: Connecticut Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

44 A. 228 (Conn. 1899), Dickerman v. New York, N.H. & H. R. Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Connecticut - 28 A. 613 (Conn. 1893), Holley v. Town & Borough of Torrington
Connecticut - 37 A. 688 (Conn. 1897), Woodbridge v. Pratt & Whitney Co.
Connecticut - 42 A. 657 (Conn. 1899), Smith v. Jewell
Connecticut - 42 A. 74 (Conn. 1899), Goodrich v. Stanton
Connecticut - 44 A. 229 (Conn. 1899), New Haven Steam Sawmill Co. v. City of New Haven