43 N.W. 724 (Wis. 1889), Schierl v. Baumel

Citation: 43 N.W. 724, 75 Wis. 69

Opinion Judge: JOHN B. CASSODAY, J.

Party Name: SCHIERL, Appellant, v. BAUMEL, Respondent

Attorney: For the appellant there was a brief C. R. Johnson and Bleekman, Tourtellotte & Bloomingdale, and oral argument by F. H. Bloomingdale. For the respondent there was a brief by C. F. Ainsworth and Dwinnell & Waldo, and oral argument by G. E. Waldo.

Case Date: Tuesday November 05, 1889

Court: Wisconsin Supreme Court