428 S.E.2d 786 (Ga. 1993), S92G1401, Gainesville Radiology Group v. Hummel

Citation: 428 S.E.2d 786, 263 Ga. 91

Opinion Judge: HUNSTEIN, Justice.

Party Name: GAINESVILLE RADIOLOGY GROUP et al. v. Mary Elaine HUMMEL.

Attorney: Weymon H. Forrester, James E. Brim, III, Forrester & Brim, Gainesville, for Gainesville Radiology Group et al., Don C. Keenan, The Keenan Law Firm, Atlanta, Jeffrey W. Lasky, Kennan & Ashman, Savannah, Alfred L. Allgood, Gainesville, for Hummel., David S. Bills, Atlanta. Forrester & Brim, Weymon...

Case Date: May 03, 1993

Court: Georgia Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

428 S.E.2d 786 (Ga. 1993), S92G1401, Gainesville Radiology Group v. Hummel

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 464 U.S. 548 (1984), 82-958, Mcdonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood
Georgia - 111 S.E.2d 164 (Ga.App. 1959), 37743, Glover v. Maddox
Georgia - 244 S.E.2d 905 (Ga.App. 1978), 55108, Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. King
Georgia - 248 S.E.2d 34 (Ga.App. 1978), 55860, Pierce v. Altman
Georgia - 299 S.E.2d 567 (Ga.App. 1983), 64833, First of Georgia Ins. Co. v. Worthington

See all quotations