427 A.2d 1121 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1981), Namm v. Charles E. Frosst and Co., Inc.

Citation: 427 A.2d 1121, 178 N.J.Super. 19

Opinion Judge: [34] Bischoff

Party Name: Gail NAMM and Paul Namm, her husband, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CHARLES E. FROSST AND CO., INC., Lakeside Labs, a division of Colgate Palmolive Co., Ayerst McKenna and Harrison Ltd., S. P. Durst and Co. Inc., Metropolitan Labs, Inc., a division of Michigan Chemical Corp., Drug Products Company, Harrower Labs Inc., Winthrop Products, a division of S

Attorney: [7] Morris M. Schnitzer argued the cause for appellants (Freeman, Friedman, Mantel, Wilson & Carney, attorneys; Morris M. Schnitzer on the brief).

Case Date: February 05, 1981

Court: New Jersey Superior Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

427 A.2d 1121 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1981), Namm v. Charles E. Frosst and Co., Inc.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 445 F.Supp. 337 (S.D.Tex. 1978), Civ. A. 74-H-1392, Gray v. United States
California - 26 Cal.3d 588, 31063, Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories
Michigan - 289 N.W.2d 20 (Mich.App. 1979), 77-3421, Abel v. Eli Lilly and Co.
New Jersey - 253 A.2d 478 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1969), Silagy v. State
New Jersey - 272 A.2d 549 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1971), Nopco Chemical Co. v. Blaw-Knox Co.

See all quotations